[Evidence on the role of HLA and MICA antibodies in renal graft loss]. / Evidencia del impacto de los anticuerpos anti-HLA y anti-MICA en la pérdida del injerto renal.

BACKGROUND: HLA and MICA antibodies are increasingly associated with poorer graft survival. The aim of this study is to report the frequency of graft loss 2 years after the detection of HLA abs and MICA abs among a group of kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We tested 196 patients with a functioning graft. Sera were screened for HLA and MICA IgG abs by Luminex, using the LABScreen Mixed, and LABScreen PRA. The sera were screened for MICA abs by Luminex. RESULTS: Of 196 kidney transplant recipients (mean age 36.7 years, 42% female), one hundred twenty four (63.3%) were negative to all tested abs, and 72 (36.7%) were positive for: HLA abs alone = 34, MICA abs alone = 29, and HLA+MICA abs = 9. At a median followup of 20.5 (1.2-25.2) months, 8 patients lost their grafts due to biopsy-confirmed chronic allograft injury: 2/124 (1.6%) ab-negative, and 6/72 (8.3%) ab-positive, with a significantly lower survival for the Ab-positive group (p = 0.046, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of circulating abs was associated with an increased risk of graft loss, and the coexistence of HLA and MICA abs increases the risk of graft loss.

Evidencia del impacto de los anticuerpos anti-HLA y anti-MICA en la pérdida del injerto renal / Evidence on the role of HLA and MICA antibodies in renal graft loss

Antecedentes: Los anticuerpos anti-HLA y anti-MICA se han asociado cada vez con mayor frecuencia a menor supervivencia del injerto renal. El objetivo de este estudio es comunicar la frecuencia de pérdida del injerto dos años después de la detección de anticuerpos anti-HLA, anti-MICA, o ambos, en un grupo de receptores de trasplante renal (RTR). Métodos: Estudiamos a 196 RTR con injerto funcional. El suero de los pacientes fue analizado para la presencia de anticuerpos IgG anti-HLA clase I y clase II con Luminex utilizando LABScreen®Mixed y LABScreen® PRA. La presencia de anticuerpos anti-MICA en el mismo suero se analizó por Luminex. Resultados: De 196 RTR (edad promedio 36.7 años, 42% sexo femenino), 124 (63.3%) fueron negativos a todos los anticuerpos estudiados y 72 (36.7%) fueron positivos: 34 para anticuerpos anti-HLA solo, 29 para anticuerpos anti-MICA solo y nueve para anticuerpos anti-HLA+anti-MICA. A una mediana de seguimiento de 20.5 meses (1.2-25.2), ocho pacientes perdieron el injerto por daño crónico del mismo, confirmado por biopsia: 2/124 (1.6%) del grupo de anticuerpos negativos y 6/72 (8.3%) del grupo de anticuerpos positivos, con una supervivencia del injerto significativamente inferior para el grupo de anticuerpos positivos (p=0.046, log-rank test). Conclusiones: La presencia de anticuerpos circulantes estuvo asociados con riesgo incrementado para pérdida del injerto; la coexistencia de anticuerpos anti-HLA y anti-MICA produjo el riesgo más alto para pérdida del injerto en la población analizada.

BACKGROUND: HLA and MICA antibodies are increasingly associated with poorer graft survival. The aim of this study is to report the frequency of graft loss 2 years after the detection of HLA abs and MICA abs among a group of kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We tested 196 patients with a functioning graft. Sera were screened for HLA and MICA IgG abs by Luminex, using the LABScreen Mixed, and LABScreen PRA. The sera were screened for MICA abs by Luminex. RESULTS: Of 196 kidney transplant recipients (mean age 36.7 years, 42% female), one hundred twenty four (63.3%) were negative to all tested abs, and 72 (36.7%) were positive for: HLA abs alone = 34, MICA abs alone = 29, and HLA+MICA abs = 9. At a median followup of 20.5 (1.2-25.2) months, 8 patients lost their grafts due to biopsy-confirmed chronic allograft injury: 2/124 (1.6%) ab-negative, and 6/72 (8.3%) ab-positive, with a significantly lower survival for the Ab-positive group (p = 0.046, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of circulating abs was associated with an increased risk of graft loss, and the coexistence of HLA and MICA abs increases the risk of graft loss.

HLA and MICA antibodies: further evidence of their impact on graft loss two years after their detection.

1. At the median post-transplant follow-up (to Ab evaluation) of 51.4 months, the prevalence of anti-HLA and anti-MICA Abs was 21.9% and 19%, respectively. 2. Overall, of the 196 patients included, 124 (63.3%) were negative to all tested Abs, and 72 (36.7%) were positive for: HLA Abs alone = 34; MICA Abs alone = 29; and HLA + MICAAbs = 9. 3. Two years after Ab evaluation, graft survival was significantly lower for patients with HLA + MICA Abs (p = 0.046). 4. The proportion of patients without CNI drugs at the time of Ab evaluation was greater in patients with one Ab and even greater in those with two Abs (HLA + MICA) when compared to patients with a negative Ab determination (p = 0.037).